Hi there, it seems it has almost been a week since my last post - that would have been unheard of back in January when I started the blog so I hope that I am not falling into the track of gradually forgetting about it, as I still think it is a really great way to put all my thoughts about my work and stuff together in one place.
I have been adding to my list of rss feeds almost daily - there always seems to be new ones i have not heard of popping up in various posts. The best ones I have recently discovered so far include Caveat Lector and Info Career Trends. The former is written by one librarian/information professional/self-confessed geek about various aspects of her work - it’s really interesting and her writing style is very entertaining! Indeed, her post on Google books was unlike anything I’ve seen anywhere else (in a good way, of course!). The latter feed is from an online journal which publishes relatively short articles by practicing librarian on a whole host of career related issues. One particular post that caught my attention was written by a librarian who used to be a bookseller, and she was discussing the various positive influences that the retail service side of her previous job had upon her work as a librarian (see ‘Confessions of a Reformed Bookseller‘). All very relevant and interesting stuff.
Walt Crawford released the March edition of his Cites and Insights online journal, in which the main article was a piece discussing the notion of ‘folksonomies’ and whether they should be used in place of tradition cataloguing (OR) or along side (AND). He of course, was fighting the corner of the AND people, which is something that I also agree with. I quite enjoy putting my own invented tags on things like these blog entries, technorati and del.icio.us but it is constantly on my mind to make them relevant, accurate descriptions and to try and be consistent throughout. Scanning various people’s tags on del.icio.us shows that most people generally just use a tag once, and they are highly personal and there is no linking related terms in any way. It’s just no use for proper searching and retrieval. But for fun, for sharing and so forth, well, I’m confident that it is fairly acceptable (although work to improve it wouldn’t go amiss). You can’t really imagine someone sitting down with AACR2 guidelines to fully catalogue their bookmarks can you? Bit too much effort, even for me and I LOVE to organise things… The paper is well worth a read. And Mr Crawford also makes reference to another paper discussing the whole folksomony debate from Guy and Tonkin (2005) ‘Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags‘, in DLib Magazine, which is also worth a read.
Technorati Tags: blogs, rss, folksonomies
Funny how I was mentioning incorporating more information into library catalogues for users (see 